School-group validation
Implementation & evidence
A single view of whether the programme is being delivered, whether pupils are participating, and whether schools have ordinary evidence that can support improvement and regulator conversations.
Active profile: . The evidence layer changes by region while the pupil mission experience remains consistent.
3Validation schoolsFictitious demo group
286Pupils assignedDemo cohort
86%Group participationSchool + permitted continuation
79%Evidence completenessDelivery + reflection + observation
Schools
Implementation quality matters more than a single headline number.
| School | Pupils | Participation | Teacher evidence | Access review | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon International School | 96 | 87% | 84% | Complete | On track |
| Creekside International School | 92 | 89% | 82% | Complete | On track |
| Oasis Academy | 98 | 81% | 71% | Review due | Support needed |
Alignment & evidence coverage
This is a contribution map, not a regulator rating predictor.
Governance actions
Evidence should drive improvement, not become regulator-only paperwork.
Validation launchGroup objectives and upper-primary cohort agreed.
Access reviewConfirm participation supports are available across all validation classes.
Mid-point reviewCompare participation and observation completeness; support low-delivery classes.
Impact reviewReview initial vs later revisit evidence at cohort level; no diagnosis or wellbeing ranking.
Governance principle: VIBE captures evidence during normal delivery. The school group can retrieve the relevant mapping without creating a separate version of the pupil experience.